Aug
14
2011

Classics You Can't Believe Are Classics

Short post today since I'm a-summer-homeworking. I'm currently reading and taking notes on THE LONG FUSE: AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ORIGINS OF WORLD WAR I. If the title didn't put you the sleep already, the writing will. The content's interesting, but I can never understand the convoluted structuring and wording of these in-depth historical explorations. I didn't need to know Cecil Rhodes was "half-educated, half-genius, half-maniac, and all English" to know he was the British god of imperialism. Just saying.

But onto the topic at hand. Summer homework also mean I've recently waded through some classics, namely DEATH IN VENICE and MADAME BOVARY.

One sentence summary time, just in case:

DEATH IN VENICE by Thomas Mann -- An aging, famous, yet unattractive author goes to Venice to find inspiration and instead discovers his pedophilia and stalker tendencies with a beautiful, god-like, yet sickly young Polish boy. (The translation I read.)

MADAME BOVARY by Gustave Flaubert -- Throughout her life of infidelity and frivolousness, Emma Bovary continually strives for and fails to realize her romantic ideals, which ultimately leads to her corruption and her appalling corruption of others. (The translation I read.)

I can appreciate MADAME BOVARY for Flaubert's clever references, as in both allusions and repeated symbols and events within the story, and unique characterization, even though I wasn't at all impressed until Madame Bovary starts her little trysts. But DEATH IN VENICE... I'm still left with the feeling of WHY, OH WHY IS THIS BOOK A CLASSIC. I'm not adverse to pedophilia in literature, but the endless Greek allusions and descriptions almost bored me to tears. DEATH IN VENICE's underlying themes might be profound but the layers and layers of obsession and depression just weren't for me.

(If you're interested in all things pedophilia, I've heard that the plot is comparable to LOLITA by Vladimir Nabokov, though I can't personally attest to that since I haven't read LOLITA.)

my last impression of DIV: old man suntanning // source

Have you ever questioned why a "classic" is a classic? If so, which one(s)?

Comments (7)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Definitely! Namely RED BADGE OF COURAGE. Not only did I question why it's a classic, but why it was published in the first place. DEATH IN VENICE seems like it takes a lot of unnecessary work to understand. Not something I'd like for summer reading!
1 reply · active 710 weeks ago
Totally. You have to tackle up and revisit everything you ever learned from obscure mythology to fully understand some things.
I might have to turn in my academic cred for this one, but I have to vote for Ulysses. Just don't get it. (I'll slink away in shame now.)
You guys have summer schoolwork?! I feel so bad for you XD WE've never had these. and those books don't look so friendly... :p good luck with that, haha :)
Yeah the first book sounds a bit like Lolita, which I generally enjoyed even if the subject matter made my skin crawl, haha.

Hmm I've never questioned why a book is a classic before, because even if I found the story a complete bore (which has happened), I could at least appreciate the social commentary or writing style or *something*. Perhaps I just haven't come across a classic that truly boggles my mind yet :D
1 reply · active 710 weeks ago
I definitely see what you mean and if I really, REALLY think about it, I do appreciate Death in Venice. I do. But my gut feeling: WHYYYYY. xD

And I'll definitely have to try Lolita sometime! Literature is the only time when I'll actually welcome skin crawling, haha.
I'm still undecided about Death In Venice. I read it in German, and one thing I really liked about it was the poetics of the language. If only it wasn't overdone. Sometimes I was completely lost. If I didn't have to focus on details (like clothing) for a test, I would have enjoyed it more. And I think I'm more likely to believe it was the artistic ideal that drew him to the boy rather than sexual attraction.
Madame Bovary...Naturalism was never my favorite period in literature, but in high school, I liked Emma. She was lost and confused, just like me :D
My guess is, classics are classics because they stand for a particular idea, period or have extreme literary value in terms of style. Which doesn't mean by far that they have to be good or that you have to like them...

Post a new comment

Comments by